In partnership with

Over the past few months, something fundamental has shifted in software.

This is not just another multiple compression cycle or macro-driven pullback. It is a structural repricing of what software is worth in an AI-native world.

The numbers are staggering:

  • ~$1.3 trillion in value has been erased across public software companies

  • ~$15B+ in annual stock-based compensation continues to be issued into a declining market

  • Entire categories of SaaS are down 30–50% in months

At the same time, AI-native companies are compounding in the opposite direction, creating one of the sharpest divergences we’ve seen in modern tech.

This is not random. It’s the market repricing the role of software itself.

What Actually Broke

For the last 15 years, SaaS followed a simple formula:

  • Build a workflow

  • Wrap it in software

  • Charge a subscription

  • Expand seats and upsell

It worked because software was the interface to getting work done.

AI breaks that assumption.

When an agent can execute workflows directly, the value shifts away from the interface and toward the outcome.

Many SaaS products were effectively:

  • UI layers

  • Workflow orchestration

  • CRUD operations on top of a database

Those layers are now compressing.

As one framing puts it, software is moving toward a much thinner stack where agents + data replace large portions of the middle layer .

The Market Is Telling You This

Public markets moved first.

  • Software stocks down ~30%+ on average

  • Some names down nearly 50%

  • Meanwhile AI companies are up ~20%+ in the same window

This divergence matters more than the absolute decline.

Because talent, capital, and attention follow relative performance.

That creates second-order effects:

1. Talent Migration

Unvested equity at software companies has materially declined in value, while AI companies have seen increases.

The result:

  • Software companies lose retention power

  • AI companies gain hiring leverage

2. Capital Rotation

Investors are not just de-risking. They are reallocating.

The narrative has shifted from:

  • “SaaS is predictable and durable”

to:

  • “AI may absorb large parts of SaaS functionality”

3. Private Market Lag

Private valuations have not fully caught up.

That creates tension:

  • Markups that cannot be realized

  • Funds sitting on paper gains with no liquidity path

  • Increasing pressure on secondaries and continuation vehicles

This Is Bigger Than Valuations

The real shift is not multiples. It’s where value accrues.

Historically:

  • Value sat in the application layer

  • Distribution was tied to software interfaces

  • Switching costs were embedded in workflows

Now:

  • Value is moving toward models, data, and distribution

  • Interfaces are becoming more interchangeable

  • Workflows are becoming dynamic, not fixed

In simple terms:

Software used to be the product. Now software is becoming the byproduct.

What Survives (and Wins)

Not all software is broken.

But the bar has moved significantly higher.

The companies that will persist tend to have:

1. Deep System Ownership

Products that are not just UI layers, but deeply embedded into infrastructure, data, or critical workflows.

2. Proprietary Data Advantages

Systems that improve with usage and cannot be easily replicated by a general-purpose model.

3. Distribution Control

Products that own the customer relationship, not just the feature set.

4. AI-Native Rebuilds

Not “AI features,” but re-architected products where AI is the core interaction model.

What This Means for Founders

If you are building today, the implications are clear:

  • You are not competing against incumbents

  • You are competing against abstraction

What This Means for Investors

This environment is creating both risk and opportunity.

Risk

  • Legacy SaaS portfolios may take longer to return capital

  • Exit timelines extend

  • Markdowns become more likely

Opportunity

  • Talent is becoming available

  • New categories are forming in real time

  • Early AI-native companies are being built at lower initial cost structures

The key shift is mindset:

This is no longer about picking the best SaaS companies.

It is about understanding which parts of software still deserve to exist.

The Bottom Line

The software meltdown is not about fear. It is about clarity.

The market is stripping away what was never truly defensible.

What remains will be:

  • More technical

  • More data-driven

  • More tightly integrated into real workflows

Everything else will compress.

And in that compression, a new generation of companies will be built.

Reach more audiences with Performance TV

Here’s the ideal TV advertising scenario: Full-screen, non-skippable ads on premium streaming channels targeting the right audiences.

You don’t want to buy broad inventory and be left questioning if it’s working. You want ads that actually get watched by the right customers.

Modern, performance-driven CTV on premium placements with transparency around what outcomes are actually happening is the answer.

If "trust us, it's on TV" isn't good enough for you anymore, check this out!

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading