If you just looked at headlines, you’d think the IPO market reopened in 2025.

Technically, it did.
But economically, it didn’t.

What we saw was not a return to form, but a controlled release of supply into a market that is still repricing venture-backed companies after the excesses of 2020–2021.

Zooming out:

This is not what a healthy IPO window looks like. Historically, reopenings are broad-based with positive momentum across cohorts. In 2025, the opposite happened: activity returned, but outcomes deteriorated.

The key signal is not issuance volume—it’s post-IPO performance. And that performance suggests demand remains highly selective.

Examples highlight the magnitude:

This is not idiosyncratic underperformance. It is systemic repricing.

That $87B represents years of optimistic private market underwriting being reconciled in a single event. In prior cycles, this adjustment might have occurred gradually through down rounds or structured financings. In this cycle, the IPO itself became the moment of truth.

The most important shift is how public markets are underwriting risk.

Across the cohort:

Public investors are now pricing:

This is not a temporary correction. It reflects a structural shift in how growth is valued.

Under ZIRP, capital was abundant and future cash flows were discounted lightly. That allowed companies to trade on narrative, scale, and optionality. Today, those same cash flows are discounted more aggressively, and optionality is no longer priced the same way.

The 2020–2021 environment was defined by:

Companies optimized for growth because that is what the market rewarded.

By 2025:

This is not just multiple compression—it is a reversal of the incentive structure that defined the last cycle.

Private markets move slowly:

Public markets move instantly:

The IPO became the first true mark-to-market event.

This explains why so many companies saw immediate dislocations post-listing. They were not declining—they were being repriced to reality for the first time.

The IPO backlog mattered.

This created system-wide pressure:

As a result, IPOs happened not because conditions were ideal, but because they were necessary.

When supply is driven by necessity rather than strength, pricing power shifts to buyers. That dynamic defined much of the 2025 IPO class.

AI introduced a new benchmark for capital allocation.

The result is a bifurcated market:

This is less about hype and more about opportunity cost. Investors now have a clear alternative where growth, margins, and long-term narratives align. That raises the bar for every other category.

Companies with strong top-line growth but weak margins underperformed.
Companies with moderate growth and strong unit economics held up better.

This is a fundamental change in valuation drivers.

Historically, IPOs provided:

Now, IPOs represent:

For many companies, the IPO price is the lowest valuation they’ve seen in years.

One of the most important implications for VCs:

This is forcing a return to fundamentals in how funds are evaluated.

If you are building toward an IPO:

Practically:

The companies that adapt early will be the ones that successfully bridge private and public expectations.

This cycle is forcing discipline:

The biggest shift is philosophical:

Funds that cannot convert paper gains into distributions will struggle to differentiate.

Globally, IPO activity has returned:

But the rules have changed.

This is no longer a market driven by:

It is a market defined by:

ChatGPT is a superpower if you know how to use it correctly.

Discover how HubSpot's guide to AI can elevate both your productivity and creativity to get more things done.

Learn to automate tasks, enhance decision-making, and foster innovation with the power of AI.

Download the free guide